January 8, 2012
Unit 3 finished up by asking course participants their experiences with either social discourse or action to members of the general public. Below was my submission:
The message that Baha’u’llah brings to mankind is one that involves a total transformation to human society. A transformation that impacts all people and translates down to all of God’s creation. The Ba’b states in one of His prayers “…so that no created being may remain beyond the presence of Thy Good Pleasure.” To me, this involves a total re-arrangement of human affairs.
I was attending a previous workshop covering “spiritual economics”. One of the facilitators mentioned that very few people really know how economics works- and that the only meaningful positive changes could only be made through a type of “tweeking” of existing economic laws. Since, in his opinion, there is over 200 years of free market economics history to draw from, it is this knowledge and wisdom that needs to be utilized rather than to throw it all out and start something new.
Paradigm is a word that describes a reaction by any person who has been challenged. The Paradigm is our very own self-created perspective of the world around us. The spiritual economic system, with all of its associated attributes of Justice, Mercy, Compassion, Forbearance and more would be in conflict with another system value-based upon individual gain. But what works in present economic models is that aspect of self-interest and to a very limited way to mutual interest. I imagine the future Kingdom of God on Earth and the practical economics laws that govern it will have cohesion at its core.
I heard it said that it is nearly impossible for one to change his/her paradigm once it has been created. I believe that we Baha’is are some examples of those who indeed have. But for the rest of humanity who have heard alternative points of view but either do not believe them or dismiss them out of hand - they react according to the paradigm they have created.
I am convinced that those who persecute, ridicule, dismiss and/or ignore alternative ideas and programs do so NOT because they will not see it but because they cannot see it. I believe that it's not the person but his paradigm.